[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <565D4E9F.2000605@miraclelinux.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 16:39:11 +0900
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com>
To: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Cc: hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ipv6: use a random ifid for headerless devices
Hi,
Bjørn Mork wrote:
> 吉藤英明 <hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com> writes:
>
>>>> +static int addrconf_ifid_random(u8 *eui, struct net_device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> + get_random_bytes(eui, 8);
>>> + eui[0] |= 0x02;
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>
>> Since random identifier is locally assigned, drop the global bit
>> instead if setting it.
>
> Yes, definitely. Thanks. I'm considering reusing __ipv6_regen_rndid()
> which already does this correctly, and also avoids some locally assigned
> addresses with special meanings.
>
> Another issue with the initial RFC is that every prefix will have a new
> random ifid, which isn't necessarily what the users expect. I wonder if
> it would be acceptable to abuse the rndid field for storing a "permanent"
> random ifid?
Well, I think we should introduce ifid in inet6_dev.
After that we could use it from other ifid methods.
--yoshfuji
>
>
> Bjørn
>
--
Hideaki Yoshifuji <hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com>
Technical Division, MIRACLE LINUX CORPORATION
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists