[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1448976352.25582.17.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 05:25:52 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
hannes@...essinduktion.org, ek@...gle.com, tom@...bertland.com,
zenczykowski@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] net: diag: Support destroying TCP sockets.
On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 16:04 +0900, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> + /* Don't race with BH socket closes such as inet_csk_listen_stop. */
> + local_bh_disable();
> + bh_lock_sock(sk);
> +
> + if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
> + smp_wmb(); /* Be consistent with tcp_reset */
This barrier is absolutely useless here, it must be moved _after_
sk->sk_err = ECONNABORTED.
Since you copied tcp_reset() code, please do not reorder barriers.
Also, comment in tcp_reset() is better IMO
/* This barrier is coupled with smp_rmb() in tcp_poll() */
> + sk->sk_err = ECONNABORTED;
> + sk->sk_error_report(sk);
Why not using tcp_need_reset() here, otherwise we might send spurious
RST for some tcp states.
Ideally, packetdrill tests would be nice.
> + tcp_send_active_reset(sk, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + tcp_done(sk);
> + }
Please do not send a v5 before letting other people comment on v3 & v4,
no need to flood netdev with many versions sent the same day.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists