[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151202140130.GP18107@gospo.home.greyhouse.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 06:01:32 -0800
From: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...lanox.com,
eladr@...lanox.com, yotamg@...lanox.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 24/26] mlxsw: spectrum: Implement LAG port
join/leave
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:49:02PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>
> Implement basic procedures for joining/leaving port to/from LAG. That
> includes HW setup of collector, core LAG mapping setup.
>
[...]
> @@ -1937,6 +2153,18 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_netdevice_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
> mlxsw_sp_port->bridged = 0;
> mlxsw_sp_master_bridge_dec(mlxsw_sp, upper_dev);
> }
> + } else if (netif_is_lag_master(upper_dev)) {
> + if (info->linking) {
> + err = mlxsw_sp_port_lag_join(mlxsw_sp_port,
> + upper_dev);
> + if (err)
> + netdev_err(dev, "Failed to join link aggregation\n");
> + } else {
> + err = mlxsw_sp_port_lag_leave(mlxsw_sp_port,
> + upper_dev);
> + if (err)
> + netdev_err(dev, "Failed to leave link aggregation\n");
> + }
> }
> break;
> }
If I'm reading this correctly, moving an offloaded port into a bond/team
or changing configuration options isn't synchronous. It seems like the
lack of immediate feedback to the caller is not desired.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists