lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151202.123007.603825526895856619.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:30:07 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	gerlitz.or@...il.com
Cc:	jiri@...nulli.us, netdev@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...lanox.com,
	eladr@...lanox.com, yotamg@...lanox.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 24/26] mlxsw: spectrum: Implement LAG port
 join/leave

From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 07:47:51 +0200

> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>> Implement basic procedures for joining/leaving port to/from LAG. That
>> includes HW setup of collector, core LAG mapping setup.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 284 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.h |  35 ++-
>>  2 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +static int mlxsw_sp_port_lag_leave(struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port,
>> +                                  struct net_device *lag_dev)
>> +{
>> +       struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp = mlxsw_sp_port->mlxsw_sp;
>> +       struct mlxsw_sp_upper *lag;
>> +       u16 lag_id = mlxsw_sp_port->lag_id;
>> +       int err;
>> +
>> +       if (!mlxsw_sp_port->lagged)
>> +               return 0;
>> +       lag = mlxsw_sp_lag_get(mlxsw_sp, lag_id);
>> +       BUG_ON(lag->ref_count == 0);
> 
> is this a must to crash the system here? can't we do something less drastic?

Indeed, please use WARN_ON() and return an error or perform some other kind of
recovery operation.

BUG_ON() is bad and is only to ever be used when the kernel's
continued operation is absolutely impossible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ