netdev - Re: OVS VXLAN decap rule has full match on TTL for the outer headers?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOftzPi8mVWtr1aJ1EeAHjXOY7jq-WZ2XnNw5UAxO5_cQrVafA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Dec 2015 09:52:07 -0800
From:	Joe Stringer <joe@....org>
To:	Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>
Cc:	Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>, Jesse Gross <jesse@...nel.org>,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ilya Lesokhin <ilyal@...lanox.com>,
	Rony Efraim <ronye@...lanox.com>,
	Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>,
	Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
	Joe Stringer <joe@....org>
Subject: Re: OVS VXLAN decap rule has full match on TTL for the outer headers?

On 29 November 2015 at 05:06, Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com> wrote:
> On 14/11/2015 08:45, Joe Stringer wrote:
>> On 13 November 2015 at 06:46, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com> wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Joe Stringer <joestringer@...ira.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>>> >> I don't follow the logic. You observed one flow which matched on
>>>> >> TTL=64, therefore all vxlan packets terminated at OVS have TTL=64?
>>> >
>>>> >> If OVS received packets with different TTLs, they would miss and
>>>> >> ovs-vswitchd would generate flows to match that traffic too.
>>> >
>>> > ok, that makes things a bit better, but (see next)
>>> >
>>>> >> If that becomes an issue, presumably the wildcard generation can be improved.
>>> >
>>> > is there a deep reason for vlxan "learned flows" to actually match w
>>> > or w.o wild cards on TTLs?? for non-tunneled flow I don't see  this
>>> > happening.
>> No deep reason I'm aware of.
>
> Hi,
>
> We looked into the OVS kernel module, and apparently there's a check
> that rejects new tunnel flows if they don't have the TTL mask set [1].
>
> I was able to trace it to this commit [2] on the OVS tree, but I don't
> quite understand why the check was added. There was some discussion
> about the patch on the mailing list [3] that hints this was about
> catching zero TTL, but it has too little context for me to understand.
>
> I'm adding the author and reviewer of the patch, perhaps they can help
> explain this requirement.

I'm not the author or reviewer, but it seems like this is an attempt
to prevent flows from matching TTL=0 then proceeding to forward the
frame. You could still match a non-zero TTL with a wildcarded mask,
but it wouldn't be possible for a single flow to match all (non-zero)
TTL values.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html