[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151203114719.GE14008@secunet.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:47:19 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ipsec impact on performance
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:38:20AM -0500, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> On (12/03/15 09:45), Steffen Klassert wrote:
> > pcrypt(echainiv(authenc(hmac(sha1-ssse3),cbc-aes-aesni)))
> >
> > Result:
> >
> > iperf -c 10.0.0.12 -t 60
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Client connecting to 10.0.0.12, TCP port 5001
> > TCP window size: 45.0 KByte (default)
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > [ 3] local 192.168.0.12 port 39380 connected with 10.0.0.12 port 5001
> > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> > [ 3] 0.0-60.0 sec 32.8 GBytes 4.70 Gbits/sec
> >
> > I provide more informatios as soon as the code is available.
>
> that's pretty good compared to the baseline.
> I'd like to try out our patches, when they are ready.
>
> I think you may get some more improvement if you manually pin the irq
> and iperf to specific cpus (at least that was my observation for transp
> mode)
I do that already. I have dedicated crypto and IO cpus, 2 cpus
do networking IO and 4 cpus do crypto (parallelized with pcrypt).
The bottleneck is now the cpu that does the TX path (checksumming
of the GSO segments).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists