netdev - Re: [patch net-next v2 4/6] mlxsw: core: Implement temperature hwmon interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMhSPt7LW=cfCrQJ20u12p-bNGzkk8YpzN7yNHSSG-d6nA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 3 Dec 2015 11:32:04 +0200
From:	Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 4/6] mlxsw: core: Implement temperature hwmon interface

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:37:58AM CET, davem@...emloft.net wrote:
>>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>>Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 23:35:31 +0100
>>
>>> Why to continue to work if we know that we are making things wrong
>>> (incorrect structure initialization in this case) ? What am I missing?
>>
>>The user might be able to continue to have connectivity and
>>report the problem.
>>
>>BUG_ON() is really a hard hammer.
>
> Okay.

So we are  removing this as well, right?

Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html