[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1449259366.7087.458357513.2858FD5A@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 21:02:46 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Anjali Singhai Jain <anjali.singhai@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] net: Generalize udp based tunnel offload
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 20:59, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> And then filling out those fields using the offsetof and sizeof of the
> headers, but this seemed to be very difficult a) because they use
> bitmasks (which of course could be converted) or in case of IPv6 a
> schema would have to be specified how to walk down the IPv6 extensions.
> This seems also to be true for NSH. Maybe gcc could help with
> compile-time introspection with bitfields in the future but I doubt that
> for now. Duplicating and maintaining two header structs for one
> tunneling protoco
Seems like I accidentally removed something here:
I wanted to write that maintaining multiple descriptions of tunneling
headers seems not worthwhile for now.
Bye,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists