netdev - Re: [PATCH net] atl1c: Improve driver not to do order 4 GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:01:25 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	pavel@....cz
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, mhocko@...nel.org, akpm@...l.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jcliburn@...il.com,
	chris.snook@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, nic-devel@...lcomm.com, ronangeles@...il.com,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] atl1c: Improve driver not to do order 4 GFP_ATOMIC
 allocation

From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 22:30:27 +0100

> On Fri 2015-12-04 11:21:40, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
>> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:11:27 +0100
>> 
>> >> >>  	if (unlikely(!ring_header->desc)) {
>> >> >> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pci_alloc_consistend failed\n");
>> >> >> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not get memory for DMA buffer\n");
>> >> >>  		goto err_nomem;
>> >> >>  	}
>> >> >>  	memset(ring_header->desc, 0, ring_header->size);
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> > 
>> >> > So this memset() will really require a different patch to get removed ?
>> >> > 
>> >> > Sigh, not sure why I review patches.
>> >> 
>> >> Agreed, please use dma_zalloc_coherent() and kill that memset().
>> > 
>> > Ok, updated. I'll also add cc: stable, because it makes notebooks with
>> > affected chipset unusable.
>> 
>> Networking patches do not use CC: stable, instead you simply ask me
>> to queue it up and then I batch submit networking fixes to -stable
>> periodically myself.
> 
> Ok, can you take the patch and ignore the Cc, or should I do one more
> iteration?

I took care of it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html