netdev - Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] net: Generalize udp based tunnel offload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20151205.130313.1952213347830357234.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 05 Dec 2015 13:03:13 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	alexander.duyck@...il.com
Cc:	tom@...bertland.com, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
	linville@...driver.com, jesse@...nel.org, anjali.singhai@...el.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kiran.patil@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] net: Generalize udp based tunnel offload

From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 00:24:55 -0800

> Still, hard blocking this isn't necessarily going to push the
> vendors to change their ways.

Pushing back is different from blocking entirely.

That means I'm going to be very difficult and make a lot of noise
until I see the message has seeped in.

It doesn't mean that I won't allow a means to use existing hardware
offloads.  You'll just have to bear with me, be patient, and survive
my tantrum on this matter.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html