[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1449507861.7162.1.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 09:04:21 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
"linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"rds-devel@....oracle.com" <rds-devel@....oracle.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] treewide: Remove newlines inside
DEFINE_PER_CPU() macros
On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 17:53 +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 2015-12-07 17:33, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Michal Marek
> > > Sent: 04 December 2015 15:26
> > > Otherwise make tags can't parse them:
> > >
> > > ctags: Warning: arch/ia64/kernel/smp.c:60: null expansion of name pattern "\1"
> > ...
> >
> > Seems to me you need to fix ctags.
>
> I'm sure the maintainers of ctags and etags would accept patches to
> describe a custom context-free grammar via commandline options, but
> until then, let's continue using the regular expressions in tags.sh and
> remove newlines in macros that tags.sh is trying to expand.
>
Do you have a list of the most common macros?
Perhaps it'd be good to add exceptions to checkpatch
80 column line rules for them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists