[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151207084050.GH14008@secunet.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 09:40:50 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ipsec impact on performance
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:38:20AM -0500, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> On (12/03/15 09:45), Steffen Klassert wrote:
> > pcrypt(echainiv(authenc(hmac(sha1-ssse3),cbc-aes-aesni)))
> >
> > Result:
> >
> > iperf -c 10.0.0.12 -t 60
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Client connecting to 10.0.0.12, TCP port 5001
> > TCP window size: 45.0 KByte (default)
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > [ 3] local 192.168.0.12 port 39380 connected with 10.0.0.12 port 5001
> > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> > [ 3] 0.0-60.0 sec 32.8 GBytes 4.70 Gbits/sec
> >
> > I provide more informatios as soon as the code is available.
>
> that's pretty good compared to the baseline.
This is GRO in combination with a pcrypt parallelized
crypto algorithm, without the parallelization GRO/GSO
does not help because crypto is the bottleneck then.
> I'd like to try out our patches, when they are ready.
I've pushed it to
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/klassert/linux-stk.git/log/?h=net-next-ipsec-offload
It is just example code, nothing that I would show usually.
But you asked for it, so here is it :)
The GRO part seems to work well, the GSO part is just a hack at the
moment.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists