[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151208093941.GA17795@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 17:39:41 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: tom@...bertland.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] rhashtable: add function to replace an
element
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:11:09 -0800
>
>> + lock = rht_bucket_lock(tbl, hash);
>> +
>> + spin_lock_bh(lock);
>> +
>> + pprev = &tbl->buckets[hash];
>> + rht_for_each(he, tbl, hash) {
>> + if (he != obj_old) {
>> + pprev = &he->next;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rcu_assign_pointer(obj_new->next, obj_old->next);
>> + rcu_assign_pointer(*pprev, obj_new);
>> + err = 0;
>> + break;
>
> Are you sure this works fine in the presence of both parallel readers and
> table expansion passes?
Good question.
What's more this is something that can be easily implemented
outside of rhashtable, i.e., by hashing a pointer to the actual
object rather than the object itself. So I'd like to see some
pretty good reasons for penny-pinching on memory and adding more
complexity to rhashtable.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists