netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] mlx5 minor SRIOV fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALzJLG9kp-a_o1Oe-_xcA3wapoAQk283+QDQPNJhmz2uNncN0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Dec 2015 13:39:32 +0200
From:	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] mlx5 minor SRIOV fixes

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:41 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> Don't do this, submitting two disconnected patch series for the same
> driver (mlx5), for the same tree (net-next).
>
for next time ? or you want me to re-submit those two patch sets ?

> Just submit them all in one batch.

In case of resubmission, What will be prefered re-submit with V1 on
the larger series, or resubmit with new topic ?

Sorry if I am asking trivial questions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html