[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151209024323.GA24768@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:43:23 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] rhashtable: add function to replace an
element
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:14:24AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
>
> That creates one more level of indirection. I don't see how add an
> atomic replace operation adds any complexity to the rhashtable, none
> of the semantics for rhashtable need to be changed.
OK after thinking about it a little bit more I think your approach
is safe and we won't need to play any more games to get this to
work. So I'm fine with this patch.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists