[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151211102130.GA11966@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:21:30 +0100
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/macb: add support for resetting PHY using GPIO
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:40:22AM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> On ven., déc. 11 2015, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 04:08:08PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> >> Hi Sascha,
> >>
> >> On jeu., déc. 10 2015, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Gregory,
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 06:49:43PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> >> >> With device tree it is no more possible to reset the PHY at board
> >> >> level. Furthermore, doing in the driver allow to power down the PHY when
> >> >> the network interface is no more used.
> >> >>
> >> >> The patch introduces a new optional property "phy-reset-gpio" inspired
> >> >> from the one use for the FEC.
> >> >
> >> > I don't think it's a good idea to further extend the usage of this
> >> > binding. The driver should use the phy-handle property and
> >> > of_phy_connect() which gives you a proper device node for the phy. Then
> >> > the phy device node should get the reset gpio. I know it's more work,
> >>
> >> So you suggest to pass from this binding:
> >> macb1: ethernet@...28000 {
> >> phy-mode = "rmii";
> >> status = "okay";
> >> #address-cells = <1>;
> >> #size-cells = <0>;
> >> status = "okay";
> >> phy-reset-gpio = <&pioE 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >>
> >> ethernet-phy@1 {
> >> reg = <0x1>;
> >> interrupt-parent = <&pioB>;
> >> interrupts = <31 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
> >>
> >> };
> >> };
> >>
> >> to this binding
> >> macb1: ethernet@...28000 {
> >> phy-mode = "rmii";
> >> status = "okay";
> >> #address-cells = <1>;
> >> #size-cells = <0>;
> >> status = "okay";
> >>
> >> ethernet-phy@1 {
> >> reg = <0x1>;
> >> interrupt-parent = <&pioB>;
> >> interrupts = <31 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
> >> phy-reset-gpio = <&pioE 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >> };
> >> };
> >
> > s/phy-reset-gpio/reset-gpios/, but yes.
>
> So I took this way. But I had several issues. The first one was that to
> be able to create a phy device it must first be detected by
> get_phy_device from of_mdiobus_register_phy. But in order to be
> detected it must answer during the scan of the mii bus. That means we
> can't bind the gpio to the device in order to use it because when we
> need to manage the reset gpio the device is not yet created.
>
> So I see 2 options:
>
> - leaving the phy-reset-gpios property in the ethernet node. Thanks to
> this we can use the gpiod functions, and it is still possible to use
> manage the power management.
>
> - using a reset-gpios property inside the phy node. But then the only
> solution to get a reference on it, will be to use
> of_get_named_gpio. All the gpiod functions need a reference to the
> device that we won't have at this point. Also we will only be able to
> power up the reset, but we won't have any reference to it latter.
Have you seen fwnode_get_named_gpiod()? This seems to be the right
function for the job.
I think we should get the binding right. The code can be changed easier
than the binding later.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists