| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <566AF20F.9060504@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:55:59 -0200
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm
Em 11-12-2015 12:30, Dmitry Vyukov escreveu:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> <marcelo.leitner@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:51:21AM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
>>> Em 11-12-2015 11:35, Dmitry Vyukov escreveu:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
>>>> <marcelo.leitner@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:03:56PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
>>>>>>>> <marcelo.leitner@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just
>>>>>>>>> not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want
>>>>>>>>> to interrupt it in case you were already testing it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which
>>>>>>>>> contains this line:
>>>>>>>>> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Use-after-free still happens.
>>>>>>> I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus
>>>>>>> the following sctp-related changes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Heh I wasn't going to reproduce this by myself anytime soon, I think.
>>>>> It's using the same socket to connect to itself, and only happens if the
>>>>> connect() gets there before the listen() call. Figured this out because
>>>>> I could only reproduce it under strace at first.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please give this other patch a try. A state command
>>>>> (sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort) was issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, which
>>>>> leads to SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB, but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME,
>>>>> which fooled the patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---8<---
>>>>> commit 9f84d50e36cee0ce66e4ce9b3b1665e0a1dbcdd3
>>>>> Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
>>>>> Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200
>>>>>
>>>>> sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement
>>>>>
>>>>> Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the
>>>>> macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer
>>>>> after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc
>>>>> pointer when the TCB is freed.
>>>>>
>>>>> As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case
>>>>> because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, there was a place issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED but returning
>>>>> SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by
>>>>> returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead.
>>>>>
>>>>> The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
>>>>> index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644
>>>>> --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
>>>>> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
>>>>> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type,
>>>>> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype,
>>>>> sctp_state_t state,
>>>>> struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
>>>>> - struct sctp_association *asoc,
>>>>> + struct sctp_association **asoc,
>>>>> void *event_arg,
>>>>> sctp_disposition_t status,
>>>>> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands,
>>>>> @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype,
>>>>> debug_post_sfn();
>>>>>
>>>>> error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state,
>>>>> - ep, asoc, event_arg, status,
>>>>> + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status,
>>>>> &commands, gfp);
>>>>> debug_post_sfx();
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype,
>>>>> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype,
>>>>> sctp_state_t state,
>>>>> struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
>>>>> - struct sctp_association *asoc,
>>>>> + struct sctp_association **asoc,
>>>>> void *event_arg,
>>>>> sctp_disposition_t status,
>>>>> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands,
>>>>> @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype,
>>>>> * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME.
>>>>> */
>>>>> if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state,
>>>>> - ep, asoc,
>>>>> + ep, *asoc,
>>>>> event_arg, status,
>>>>> commands, gfp)))
>>>>> goto bail;
>>>>> @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype,
>>>>> break;
>>>>>
>>>>> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB:
>>>>> + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT:
>>>>> /* This should now be a command. */
>>>>> + *asoc = NULL;
>>>>> break;
>>>>>
>>>>> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME:
>>>>> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT:
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * We should no longer have much work to do here as the
>>>>> * real work has been done as explicit commands above.
>>>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
>>>>> index 6f46aa16cb76..d801e151498a 100644
>>>>> --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
>>>>> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
>>>>> @@ -4959,12 +4959,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort(
>>>>> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg;
>>>>> - sctp_disposition_t retval;
>>>>>
>>>>> /* Stop T1-init timer */
>>>>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP,
>>>>> SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT));
>>>>> - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME;
>>>>>
>>>>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort));
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -4983,7 +4981,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort(
>>>>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED,
>>>>> SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT));
>>>>>
>>>>> - return retval;
>>>>> + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Still happens...
>>>> I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 with your
>>>> latest patch applied.
>>>> Can you figure out what happens now from the report below? If not I
>>>> can create a repro, it's just somewhat time consuming.
>>>
>>> I can imagine. I don't know how this fuzzer works, but it would be nice if
>>> this reproducer extractor could be executed easier. So far, we have
>
> It would be very nice, but it is not always trivial.
>
> Fuzzer pretty much tried to trigger everything that is triggerable
> from user-space. Sometimes what it does can make no sense. But it is
> still super-important for contexts like Android, where programs can be
> as malicious as you can imagine and the system heavily relies on
> kernel for protection.
>
>>> identified 3 different issues already leading to this bug:
>>> - 1st, the handling on DELETE_TCB
>>> - 2nd, the handling on DISPOSITION_ABORT
>>> - 3rd, the bad combination on internal state-machine command to a return
>>> value
>>>
>>> I can and will review it again, but it's doing nasty stuff like using the
>>> same socket to connect to itself. It's hard to imagine all those
>>> combinations in mind that might lead to that use-after-free.
>>>
>>> Keep you posted.. thanks.
>>
>> Found a similar place in abort primitive handling like in this last
>> patch update, it's probably the issue you're still triggering.
>>
>> Also found another place that may lead to this use after free, in case
>> we receive a packet with a chunk that has no data.
>
> I see that sctp_cmd_interpreter does:
>
> sctp_cmd_delete_tcb(commands, asoc);
> asoc = NULL;
>
> Won't it be simpler to pass sctp_association ** to this function and
> let it clear it whenever it decides to free the objects, rather than
> try to duplicate its logic on higher level. Just a blind thought.
That's like a short-circuit between the two logics, it's already
somewhat duplicated. I'm afraid that these other still returning
DISPOSITION_CONSUME may not be aware that the assoc is going away in
short term, maybe we have some other bug there too.
If/when we simplify sctp_side_effects() and get ride of that switch
case, that's probably how it will work, though.
Marcelo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists