[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151213214709.GA1827@salvia>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:47:09 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, davem <davem@...emloft.net>,
fw@...len.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] nftables: use list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse to
traversal commit_list in nf_tables_abort
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:24:21AM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:48:07PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
[...]
> >> the right order of rollback should be:
> >> 'del tab trans' -> 'del set trans' -> 'add set trans'.
> >> which is opposite with commit_list order.
> >>
> >> so fix it by rolling back commits with reverse order in nf_tables_abort.
> >
> >
> > You're reporting a kernel panic.
> >
> > Could you please provide a sequence of commands to reproduce it with
> > the existing code?
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> the reproduce is a kind of long, do i need to repost this patch with
> the reproduce?
No need to resend.
Yes, we need this reverse iteration there to handle the 'delete table'
command in the batch. This problem happens since we have
nft_flush_table().
Other callsites are artificially restriction deletion of inactive
objects but that should be removed as we already discuss on the
mailing list.
So I'm applying this, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists