[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151214170642.GA4180@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 01:06:42 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netlink: fix boolean evaluation on bound
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 05:55:25PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> portid may be 0, thus bound will set the flag to false for in-kernel
> created netlink sockets.
>
> Fixes: da314c9923fed55 ("netlink: Replace rhash_portid with bound")
> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> ---
> This patch should not affect anything and is just meant to close this
> loophole in future. I based it on net, but you can also apply it to
> net-next.
Nack. The bound field only needs to be true for user-space sockets.
So please explain why you need it to be true for kernel sockets.
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists