netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] net: diag: Support destroying TCP sockets.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1450116183.8474.5.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Dec 2015 10:03:03 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	hannes@...essinduktion.org, ek@...gle.com, tom@...bertland.com,
	zenczykowski@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] net: diag: Support destroying TCP sockets.

On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 02:29 +0900, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:

> +config INET_DIAG_DESTROY
> +	bool "INET: allow privileged process to administratively close sockets"
> +	depends on INET_DIAG && (IPV6 || IPV6=n)
> +	default n

I can see the effect of (IPV6 || IPv6=n) for a tristate,
but what is the intent for a bool ?

It seems INET_DIAG_DESTROY can be selected regardless of IPV6 being off,
on, or a module ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html