[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHo-OoxJHuuYqzpSmYkMKvXjmesMD=_G5_G5uBndNSPHTy8qBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:36:37 +0100
From: Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Cc: Linux NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Erik Kline <ek@...gle.com>, Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] net: diag: Support destroying TCP socketsr
I'd tend to agree that reset or abort would be preferable to destroy.
After all... the socket doesn't actually go away.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists