[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1450292515.23587.6.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:01:55 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: add IPV6_HDRINCL option for raw sockets
On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 17:22 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> Same as in Windows, we miss IPV6_HDRINCL for SOL_IPV6 and SOL_RAW.
> The SOL_IP/IP_HDRINCL is not available for IPv6 sockets.
[]
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/raw.c b/net/ipv6/raw.c
[]
> @@ -972,6 +972,11 @@ static int do_rawv6_setsockopt(struct sock *sk,
> int level, int optname,
> return -EFAULT;
>
> switch (optname) {
> + case IPV6_HDRINCL:
> + if (sk->sk_type != SOCK_RAW)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + inet_sk(sk)->hdrincl = !!val;
trivia:
ipv4/sockglue.c uses the ternary '? 1 : 0' convention for this.
It might be nicer to be consistent.
Then again sockglue.c is inconsistent about that too.
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:736: inet->hdrincl = val ? 1 : 0;
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:743: inet->nodefrag = val ? 1 : 0;
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:746: inet->bind_address_no_port = val ? 1 : 0;
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:754: inet->recverr = !!val;
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:772: inet->mc_loop = !!val;
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1123: inet->freebind = !!val;
There's no change to object code either way.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists