[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1450308935.8474.103.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:35:35 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, hannes@...essinduktion.org, ek@...gle.com,
tom@...bertland.com, zenczykowski@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Support administratively closing application
sockets
On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 14:55 -0500, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 15-12-16 10:50 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 07:43 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I see no security checks in the diag infrastructure.
> >> Up until now diag has been read-only access and therefore has been
> >> allowed for all users.
> >
> > It is still allowed to all users.
> >
> > Only the 'destroy' operation is restricted.
>
> The question i had was the opposite when i saw this: why are
> regular users allowed to read admin (and any other users) details?;->
> On this specific feature: why, as a regular user, I cant close
> connections attributed to me (and have to use CAP_NET_ADMIN)?
I guess that we need to be careful here.
socket can be shared by fd passing to multiple users.
Who really owns it ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists