[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5672FF06.2030803@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:29:26 -0500
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Cc: marcelo.leitner@...il.com, vyasevic@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: sctp should release assoc when
sctp_make_abort_user return NULL in sctp_close
On 12/17/2015 09:30 AM, Xin Long wrote:
> In sctp_close, sctp_make_abort_user may return NULL because of memory
> allocation failure. If this happens, it will bypass any state change
> and never free the assoc. The assoc has no chance to be freed and it
> will be kept in memory with the state it had even after the socket is
> closed by sctp_close().
>
> So if sctp_make_abort_user fails to allocate memory, we should just
> free the asoc, as there isn't much else that we can do.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
> ---
> net/sctp/socket.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index 9b6cc6d..267b8f8 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -1513,8 +1513,12 @@ static void sctp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
> struct sctp_chunk *chunk;
>
> chunk = sctp_make_abort_user(asoc, NULL, 0);
> - if (chunk)
> + if (chunk) {
> sctp_primitive_ABORT(net, asoc, chunk);
> + } else {
> + sctp_unhash_established(asoc);
> + sctp_association_free(asoc);
> + }
I don't think you can do that for an association that has not been closed.
I think a cleaner approach might be to update abort primitive handlers
to handle a NULL chunk value and unconditionally call the primitive.
This guarantees that any timers or waitqueues that might be active are
stopped correctly.
-vlad
> } else
> sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN(net, asoc, NULL);
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists