netdev - Re: [PATCH] wireless: change cfg80211 regulatory domain info as debug messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151217031652.GA3821@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:16:52 +0800
From:	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumbach@...il.com>,
	Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.l-h@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless: change cfg80211 regulatory domain info as
 debug messages

Hi, Johannes

Sorry for late feedback, I was busying on other things.

On 12/11/15 at 03:38pm, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-11-15 at 15:31 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > cfg80211 module prints a lot of messages like below. Actually
> > printing once is acceptable but sometimes it will print again and
> > again, it looks very annoying. It is better to change these detail
> > messages to debugging only.
> > 
> 
> Despite the objections, I've applied this patch now.
> 

Thanks a lot.

> I've made one change: keeping the alpha2 (e.g. "US") printed in some of
> the pr_err() cases in this file.
> I also got rid of CONFIG_CFG80211_REG_DEBUG in a separate patch.
> 
> I somewhat agree with the objections, but if the kernel is with
> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG then it's really simple to get the messages back
> by enabling them for this file.
> 
> Where the messages were used as an indication of something having gone
> awry at a different level (e.g. mac80211 disconnect) I don't really
> quite agree - that then perhaps should have a more explicit (and less
> noisy) message.
> 
> I also agree that the regulatory code is quite opaque, and the way it
> arrives at certain conclusions is not always obvious. These messages
> don't help all that much though since they don't contain the actual
> input to the decisions. I think for that, we'd be much better served
> with some kind of tracepoint or so that records all the information.

I think you guys are expert in this area, I will agree with all of
above. But I hope we can have some rate limited messages at least
especially for endless things.

Thanks
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html