netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2] iplink: support 'stable-privacy' IPv6 addrgenmode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87y4cs0wp7.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Date:	Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:26:28 +0100
From:	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] iplink: support 'stable-privacy' IPv6 addrgenmode

Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> writes:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:15:14 +0100
> Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no> wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
>
> Does not apply to current code base. Probably because of Hannes recent changes.

Yes, I saw that you applied Hannes' ipaddress.c patch, which conficts
with this one.  No problem, either way is fine by me.  I'll redo the man
page thing as part of the next round for "addrgenmode random", if/when
that is applied to the kernel.

BTW, I didn't understand your comment regarding Hannes' iplink.c patch.
If the ipaddress patch is OK, then the iplink patch is just the part
missing for show/set symmetry.  Or did I misunderstand something?

Bjørn

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html