netdev - Re: [PATCH][iproute2] tc/q_htb.c: Fix the MPU value output in 'tc -d class show dev <device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1313271450456765@web7g.yandex.ru>
Date:	Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:39:25 +0300
From:	Dmitrii Shcherbakov <fw.dmitrii@...dex.com>
To:	Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][iproute2] tc/q_htb.c: Fix the MPU value output in 'tc -d class show dev <device_name> ' command

Phil,

> Dmitrii, did iproute2 without your change even print the overhead as set
> by you before? Looking at the code, I'd assume not.

Tried building iproute2 (as of tag 4.2) and using the upstream linux kernel (also tag 4.2 - 64291f7db5bd8150a74ad2036f1037e6a0428df2):

~/src/iproute2/tc$ uname -r
4.2.0-040200-generic

~/src/iproute2/tc$ grep -inP 'htb' /boot/config-4.2.0-040200-generic 
1331:CONFIG_NET_SCH_HTB=m

~/src/iproute2/tc$ lsmod | grep htb
sch_htb                24576  1

~/src/iproute2/tc$ ./tc -d class show dev eth0

~/src/iproute2/tc$ sudo ./tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12

~/src/iproute2/tc$ sudo ./tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbps ceil 100kbps mpu 256 overhead 64

~/src/iproute2/tc$ tc -d class show dev eth0
class htb 1:1 root prio 0 quantum 10000 rate 800Kbit overhead 64 ceil 800Kbit linklayer ethernet burst 1600b/1 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1600b/1 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0

~/src/iproute2/tc$ lsmod | grep htb
sch_htb                24576  1

So it looks like the overhead is being set correctly, but the mpu is not, even though the respective kernel module is loaded judging by what I see.

Regards,
Dmitrii Shcherbakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html