[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151220191806.GA2027@netboy>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 20:18:06 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
Tal Alon <talal@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V1 3/4] net/mlx5e: Add HW timestamping (TS)
support
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 03:08:18PM +0200, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> Agree, but what will happen if the calculated period is too rapid ?
> shouldn't we have some kind of minimum ?
If the period is shorter than you can handle, then the clock will
overflow and is therefore unusable.
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists