lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151222.154552.1762036210080562354.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 22 Dec 2015 15:45:52 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	gerlitz.or@...il.com
Cc:	hariprasad@...lsio.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, leedom@...lsio.com,
	nirranjan@...lsio.com, john.r.fastabend@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] cxgb4: add dcb info node in debugfs

From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 09:33:22 +0200

> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Hariprasad Shenai
> <hariprasad@...lsio.com> wrote:
>> Add new /sys/kernel/debug/cxgb4/*/dcb_info node to dump out
>> various Data Center Bridging information.
> 
> why? what's wrong with using the lldp tool for that purpose?

Agreed, and I don't like your explanation.

Even if you are using firmware managed DCB, the lldp tool should be
usable for querying.

People need to stop putting so much crap into debugfs, it's a serious
pet peeve of mine.

Every piece of driver unique interface crap you put into debugfs is a
_HARDSHIP_ for the user.  Because they have to learn a unique way to
do X in every driver that tries to export the same kind of
functionality.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ