[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151222170154.GA1940@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 18:01:54 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
Tal Alon <talal@...lanox.com>,
Majd Dibbiny <majd@...lanox.com>,
Achiad Shochat <achiad@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 3/4] net/mlx5e: Add HW timestamping (TS)
support
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:00:52PM +0200, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> Ok, but what will happen if somehow tstamp->overflow_period is zero ?
> the work will run too rapidly.
> don't we need to have protection against such case.
Why not return an error in that case?
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists