netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC 24/28] net: dsa: If a switch fails to probe, defer probing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <567B080D.40406@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:46:05 -0800
From:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, narmstrong@...libre.com,
	vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 24/28] net: dsa: If a switch fails to probe, defer
 probing

Le 23/12/2015 04:56, Andrew Lunn a écrit :
> Switches are either listed in device tree of platform_data. They
> should exist. If the probe fails, defer the probe, which is the likely
> cause of failure, not broken device tree or platform data.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
-- 
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html