[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPWQB7HSO3xmSn+r-EsWnMvBsncLwH1m7yH=7t607ozzAqcGoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 14:44:30 -0800
From: Joe Stringer <joe@....org>
To: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] openvswitch: Fix helper reference leak
On 9 December 2015 at 15:33, Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Joe Stringer <joe@....org> wrote:
>> On 9 December 2015 at 14:50, Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Joe Stringer <joe@....org> wrote:
>>>> If the actions (re)allocation fails, or the actions list is larger than the
>>>> maximum size, and the conntrack action is the last action when these
>>>> problems are hit, then references to helper modules may be leaked. Fix
>>>> the issue.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: cae3a2627520 ("openvswitch: Allow attaching helpers to ct action")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joe@....org>
>>>> ---
>>>> net/openvswitch/conntrack.c | 9 ++++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
>>>> index c2cc11168fd5..585a5aa81f89 100644
>>>> --- a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
>>>> +++ b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
>>>> @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ struct ovs_conntrack_info {
>>>> struct md_labels labels;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> +static void __ovs_ct_free_action(struct ovs_conntrack_info *ct_info);
>>>> +
>>>> static u16 key_to_nfproto(const struct sw_flow_key *key)
>>>> {
>>>> switch (ntohs(key->eth.type)) {
>>>> @@ -708,7 +710,7 @@ int ovs_ct_copy_action(struct net *net, const struct nlattr *attr,
>>>> nf_conntrack_get(&ct_info.ct->ct_general);
>>>
>>> I see another issue here. Updates to ct_info are done after it is
>>> copied to action list. ct action on the action list and ct_info are
>>> inconsistent, So it is still leaking nf-conntrack reference.
>>
>> You're referring to the below?
>>
>> __set_bit(IPS_CONFIRMED_BIT, &ct_info.ct->status);
>> nf_conntrack_get(&ct_info.ct->ct_general);
>>
>> ct_info.ct points to the same location as the version that has been
>> copied into the action list. I agree it's a bit misleading though. If
>> you're not seeing something else, it seems cosmetic so I can (should?)
>> follow up on net-next.
>
> Right, there is no leak, cosmetic changes can be done later. I do not
> have problem with this patch as it is.
>
> Acked-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Turns out that there wasn't a leak on nf-conntrack, but on the
template. I sent a patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists