[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2F9547E@RTITMBSV03.realtek.com.tw>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:20:25 +0000
From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"peter@...ensteyn.nl" <peter@...ensteyn.nl>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] r8152: fix lockup when runtime PM is enabled
Oliver Neukum [mailto:oneukum@...e.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 4:20 PM
[...]
> No, step (2) does not exist. Calls to suspend() and [reset_]resume()
> always balance. Usually a driver shouldn't care about system suspend.
> The way the driver is currently coded will also fail for Port-Power Off.
It is different with Windows. The Windows would resume the device before
system suspend, if the system suspend follows the autosuspend.
Would this be a problem? After system suspend, the device may wake up
the system when receiving any packet, not only magic packet. The wake
events are different for system suspend and autosuspend. However, I
couldn't change the wake event, because the autosuspend occurs first,
and the suspend() is only called once.
Best Regards,
Hayes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists