netdev - [PATCH v2 0/3] bpf: hash: use per-bucket spinlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 Dec 2015 22:40:24 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] bpf: hash: use per-bucket spinlock 

Hi,

This patchset tries to optimize ebpf hash map, and follows
the idea:

        Both htab_map_update_elem() and htab_map_delete_elem()
        can be called from eBPF program, and they may be in kernel
        hot path, it isn't efficient to use a per-hashtable lock
        in this two helpers, so this patch converts the lock into
        per-bucket spinlock.

With this patchset, looks the performance penalty from eBPF
decreased a lot, see the following test:

        1) run 'tools/biolatency' of bcc before running block test;

        2) run fio to test block throught over /dev/nullb0,
        (randread, 16jobs, libaio, 4k bs) and the test box
        is one 24cores(dual sockets) VM server:
        - without patchset:  607K IOPS
        - with this patchset: 1184K IOPS
        - without running eBPF prog: 1492K IOPS

TODO:
        - remove the per-hashtable atomic counter

V2:
        - fix checking on buckets size
V1:
        - fix the wrong 3/3 patch

 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Thanks,
Ming Lei


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html