[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1451400027-28892-1-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 22:40:24 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] bpf: hash: use per-bucket spinlock
Hi,
This patchset tries to optimize ebpf hash map, and follows
the idea:
Both htab_map_update_elem() and htab_map_delete_elem()
can be called from eBPF program, and they may be in kernel
hot path, it isn't efficient to use a per-hashtable lock
in this two helpers, so this patch converts the lock into
per-bucket spinlock.
With this patchset, looks the performance penalty from eBPF
decreased a lot, see the following test:
1) run 'tools/biolatency' of bcc before running block test;
2) run fio to test block throught over /dev/nullb0,
(randread, 16jobs, libaio, 4k bs) and the test box
is one 24cores(dual sockets) VM server:
- without patchset: 607K IOPS
- with this patchset: 1184K IOPS
- without running eBPF prog: 1492K IOPS
TODO:
- remove the per-hashtable atomic counter
V2:
- fix checking on buckets size
V1:
- fix the wrong 3/3 patch
kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
Thanks,
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists