netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] net-qmi_wwan: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in qmi_wwan_register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 02 Jan 2016 20:45:35 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bjorn@...k.no
Cc:	elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, julia.lawall@...6.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net-qmi_wwan: Delete an unnecessary variable
 initialisation in qmi_wwan_register_subdriver()

From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 22:30:48 +0100

> SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> writes:
> 
>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
>> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 17:35:03 +0100
>>
>> Omit explicit initialisation at the beginning for one local variable
>> that is redefined before its first use.
> 
> 
> This patch is unnecessary. The variable initialisation is redundant.
> See the difference?  Sending an unnecessary patch causes unnecessary
> load on reviewers and maintainers.  Keeping redundant code has no
> measurable cost, and can save the same maintainers a lot of trouble
> later.

+1

I'm getting really tired of these changes.  And a lot of them are
coming in right now...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html