[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5689CD59.6030900@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 09:39:37 +0800
From: Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, mst@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] vhost: basic device IOTLB support
On 2015/12/31 15:13, Jason Wang wrote:
> This patch tries to implement an device IOTLB for vhost. This could be
> used with for co-operation with userspace(qemu) implementation of
> iommu for a secure DMA environment in guest.
>
> The idea is simple. When vhost meets an IOTLB miss, it will request
> the assistance of userspace to do the translation, this is done
> through:
>
> - Fill the translation request in a preset userspace address (This
> address is set through ioctl VHOST_SET_IOTLB_REQUEST_ENTRY).
> - Notify userspace through eventfd (This eventfd was set through ioctl
> VHOST_SET_IOTLB_FD).
>
> When userspace finishes the translation, it will update the vhost
> IOTLB through VHOST_UPDATE_IOTLB ioctl. Userspace is also in charge of
> snooping the IOTLB invalidation of IOMMU IOTLB and use
> VHOST_UPDATE_IOTLB to invalidate the possible entry in vhost.
Is there any performance data shows the difference with IOTLB
supporting? I doubt we may see performance decrease since the flush code
path is longer than before.
--
best regards
yang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists