[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACna6rwAVhKX0KnW=BTBDvNe8aaSvQiuMSnMmbQ64Benm50g9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:18:30 +0100
From: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To: Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>
Cc: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
libertas-dev@...ts.infradead.org,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net-libertas: Better exception handling in if_spi_host_to_card_worker()
On 4 January 2016 at 11:05, Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com> wrote:
> On 03-01-16 16:18, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 3 January 2016 at 10:36, Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On 02-01-16 12:21, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>>>>> Did you look at the resulting assembly code for different target architectures?
>>>>
>>>> Not yet. - Which execution system variants would you recommend for
>>>> further comparisons?
>>>
>>> Guess x86{,_64} and arm would be good candidates, ie. CISC vs. RISC.
>>
>> Oh, don't forget about MIPS with its fancy branches handling. You know
>> about it, don't you?
>
> You are asking me, right ;-) ? I have come across my share of MIPS
> platforms here at Broadcom, but I still try to avoid them as much as
> possible.
I was more thinking about author on this patch. But it's indeed an
interesting thing, just to know, how MIPS CPU handles branches ;)
--
Rafał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists