[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <568BF38D.4060803@6wind.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:47:09 +0100
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: Saurabh Mohan <saurabh@...anenetworks.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
stephen@...workplumber.org, davem@...emloft.net,
pshelar@...ira.com, tgraf@...g.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] Support outside netns for tunnels.
Le 04/01/2016 19:45, Saurabh Mohan a écrit :
>
> This patch enchances a tunnel interface, like gre, to have the tunnel
> encap/decap be in the context of a network namespace that is different from
> the namespace of the tunnel interface.
>
> From userspace this feature may be configured using the new 'onetns' keyword:
> ip netns exec custa ip link add dev tun1 type gre local 10.0.0.1 \
> remote 10.0.0.2 onetns outside
>
> In the above example the tunnel would be in the 'custa' namespace and the
> tunnel endpoints would be in the 'outside' namespace.
What is the difference with the following commands?
ip netns exec outside ip link add dev tun1 type gre local 10.0.0.1 \
remote 10.0.0.2
ip netns exec outside ip link set tun1 netns custa
or
ip exec custa ip netns set outside 1234
ip exec custa ip link add tun1 link-netnsid 1234 type gre local 10.0.0.1 \
remote 10.0.0.2
Regards,
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists