[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7tbn8z98me.fsf@aconole.bos.csb>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 13:36:09 -0500
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] net/core/dev: Warn on an impossibly short offload frame
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> writes:
> On Sat, 2016-01-02 at 19:25 -0500, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> When signaling that a GRO frame is ready to be processed, the network stack
>> correctly checks length and aborts processing when a frame is less than 14
>> bytes. However, such a condition is really indicative of a broken driver,
>> and should be loudly signaled, rather than silently dropped as the case is
>> today.
>>
>> Convert the condition to use WARN_ON() to ensure that the stack loudly
>> complains about such broken drivers.
> []
>> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> []
>> @@ -4579,7 +4579,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *napi_frags_skb(struct
>> napi_struct *napi)
>> eth = skb_gro_header_fast(skb, 0);
>> if (unlikely(skb_gro_header_hard(skb, hlen))) {
>> eth = skb_gro_header_slow(skb, hlen, 0);
>> - if (unlikely(!eth)) {
>> + if (WARN_ON(!eth)) {
>> napi_reuse_skb(napi, skb);
>> return NULL;
>> }
>
> It's generally a good idea to use
> WARN_ON_RATELIMIT or WARN_ON_ONCE.
Okay, I'll respin switching to WARN_ON_RATELIMIT, if that's a better
approach.
Thanks for the review, Joe!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists