[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <568B7F06.1010500@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:29:58 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: rsi: Delete unnecessary variable initialisations in
rsi_send_mgmt_pkt()
> That said, if you figure out some change that produces significant
> reductions in code or binary size on multiple architectures without
> making things more complicated, less readable or making the code or
> binary size larger, then by all means propose it.
Are you looking also for "a proof" that such changes are worthwhile?
> "This makes things smaller" carries much more weight than
> "I think this is better".
Can the discussed implementation of a function like "rsi_send_mgmt_pkt"
become a bit smaller by the deletion of extra variable initialisations
> Almost all of the changes you've proposed that have seen any
> discussion whatsoever fall into the latter category.
Thanks for your interesting feedback.
Can a further constructive dialogue evolve from the presented information?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists