netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/3] macsec: introduce IEEE 802.1AE driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1451988280.7710.28.camel@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:04:40 +0100
From:	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/3] macsec: introduce IEEE 802.1AE driver

On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 13:38 +0100, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> +#define MACSEC_SCI_LEN 8
> +
> +/* SecTAG length = macsec_eth_header without the optional SCI */
> +#define MACSEC_TAG_LEN 6
> +
> +struct macsec_eth_header {
> +	struct ethhdr eth;
> +	/* SecTAG */
> +	u8  tci_an;
> +#if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> +	u8  short_length:6,
> +		  unused:2;
> +#elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> +	u8        unused:2,
> +	    short_length:6;
> +#else
> +#error	"Please fix <asm/byteorder.h>"
> +#endif
> +	__be32 packet_number;
> +	u8 secure_channel_id[8]; /* optional */
> +} __packed;

> +#define MACSEC_NEEDED_HEADROOM sizeof(struct macsec_eth_header)

The needed_headroom field does not need to include the hard_header_len,
which, for macsec devices, is set to ETH_HLEN by ether_setup().

Since on xmit path you can push up to MACSEC_TAG_LEN + MACSEC_SCI_LEN +
sizeof(__be16) bytes on the skb head, possibly that should be a better
MACSEC_NEEDED_HEADROOM value.

> +static void macsec_count_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct macsec_tx_sc *tx_sc,
> +			    struct macsec_tx_sa *tx_sa)
> +{
> +	struct pcpu_tx_sc_stats *txsc_stats = this_cpu_ptr(tx_sc->stats);
> +
> +	u64_stats_update_begin(&txsc_stats->syncp);
> +	if (tx_sc->encrypt) {
> +		txsc_stats->stats.OutOctetsEncrypted += skb->len;
> +		txsc_stats->stats.OutPktsEncrypted++;
> +		this_cpu_inc(tx_sa->stats->OutPktsEncrypted);

The last line is probably a duplicate

> +	} else {
> +		txsc_stats->stats.OutOctetsProtected += skb->len;
> +		txsc_stats->stats.OutPktsProtected++;
> +		this_cpu_inc(tx_sa->stats->OutPktsProtected);

Same as above.

> +		struct pcpu_secy_stats *secy_stats = this_cpu_ptr(macsec->stats);
> +
> +		if (macsec->secy.validate_frames == MACSEC_VALIDATE_STRICT) {
> +			u64_stats_update_begin(&secy_stats->syncp);
> +			secy_stats->stats.InPktsNoTag++;
> +			u64_stats_update_end(&secy_stats->syncp);
> +			continue;
> +		}

Can the 64_stats_update block be replaced by a single:
this_cpu_inc(macsec->stats->InPktsNoTag) ?

There are a few others similar blocks below.

Thanks,

Paolo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html