lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 6 Jan 2016 10:55:22 -0800
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	"Christopher S. Hall" <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"Stanton, Kevin B" <kevin.b.stanton@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 1/6] Timekeeping cross timestamp interface for device drivers

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Christopher S. Hall
<christopher.s.hall@...el.com> wrote:
> ACKNOWLEDGMENT: The original correlated clock source and cross
> timestamp code was developed by Thomas Gleixner
> <tglx@...utronix.de>. It has changed considerably and any mistakes are
> mine.
>
> The precision with which events on multiple networked systems can be
> synchronized using, as an example, PTP (IEEE 1588, 802.1AS) is limited
> by the precision of the cross timestamps between the system clock and
> the device (timestamp) clock. Precision here is the degree of
> simultaneity when capturing the cross timestamp.
>
> Currently the PTP cross timestamp is captured in software using the
> PTP device driver ioctl PTP_SYS_OFFSET. Reads of the device clock are
> interleaved with reads of the realtime clock. At best, the precision
> of this cross timestamp is on the order of several microseconds due to
> software latencies. Sub-microsecond precision is required for
> industrial control and some media applications. To achieve this level
> of precision hardware supported cross timestamping is needed.
>
> Hardware cross timestamps are derived from simultaneously capturing
> the device clock and the system clock. Applications use timestamps in
> nanoseconds rather than clock ticks. The device driver can scale
> device clock ticks to device time in nanoseconds, but cannot transform
> system clock ticks. Only the kernel timekeeping code can do this. The
> function get_device_system_crosststamp() allows device drivers to
> return a cross timestamp with system time properly scaled to
> nanoseconds.
>
> The cross timestamps contain the realtime and monotonic raw clock
> times. The realtime value is needed to discipline that clock using PTP
> and the monotonic raw value is used for applications that don't
> require a "real" time, but need an unadjusted clock time.
>
> The get_device_system_crosststamp() code calls back into the driver
> to ensure that the system counter is within the current timekeeping
> update interval. Because of possible NTP/PTP frequency adjustments,
> extrapolating a realtime clock time outside the current interval with
> a potentially different scaling factor can result in a small amount of
> error.
>
> Modern Intel hardware provides an Always Running Timer (ART) which is
> exactly related to TSC through a known frequency ratio. The ART is
> routed to devices on the system and is used to precisely and
> simultaneously capture the device clock with the ART. The kernel
> timekeeping code requires a system clock value from the current clock
> source to calculate the system time. The correlated clocksource adds a
> means to transform a clock (in this case ART) exactly to the system
> clock (TSC clocksource) that is used to calculate system time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christopher S. Hall <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/clocksource.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/timekeeping.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/time/timekeeping.c   | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  3 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/clocksource.h b/include/linux/clocksource.h
> index 7784b59..4b7973d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clocksource.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clocksource.h
> @@ -255,4 +255,31 @@ static inline void clocksource_probe(void) {}
>  #define CLOCKSOURCE_ACPI_DECLARE(name, table_id, fn)           \
>         ACPI_DECLARE_PROBE_ENTRY(clksrc, name, table_id, 0, NULL, 0, fn)
>
> +/*
> + * struct correlated_cs - Descriptor for a clocksource correlated to another
> + *     clocksource
> + * @related_cs:                Pointer to the related timekeeping clocksource
> + * @convert:           Conversion function to convert a timestamp from
> + *                     the correlated clocksource to cycles of the related
> + *                     timekeeping clocksource
> + */
> +struct correlated_cs {
> +       struct clocksource      *related_cs;
> +       cycle_t                 (*convert)(struct correlated_cs *cs,
> +                                          cycle_t cycles);
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * struct raw_system_counterval - system counter value captured in device
> + *     driver used to produce system/device cross-timestamp
> + * @system:    System counter value
> + * @cs:                Clocksource related to system counter value. This is used by
> + *             timekeeping code to verify validity of counter for system time
> + *             conversion
> + */
> +struct raw_system_counterval {
> +       cycle_t                 cycles;
> +       struct clocksource      *cs;
> +};
> +
>  #endif /* _LINUX_CLOCKSOURCE_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/timekeeping.h b/include/linux/timekeeping.h
> index ec89d84..2209943 100644
> --- a/include/linux/timekeeping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/timekeeping.h
> @@ -266,6 +266,41 @@ extern void timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64(struct timespec64 *delta);
>  extern void ktime_get_raw_and_real_ts64(struct timespec64 *ts_raw,
>                                         struct timespec64 *ts_real);
>
> +
> +/*
> + * struct system_device_crosststamp - system/device cross-timestamp
> + *     (syncronized capture)
> + * @device:    Device time
> + * @realtime:  Realtime simultaneous with device time
> + * @monoraw:   Monotonic raw simultaneous with device time
> + */
> +struct system_device_crosststamp {
> +       ktime_t device;
> +       ktime_t sys_realtime;
> +       ktime_t sys_monoraw;
> +};
> +
> +struct raw_system_counterval;
> +/*
> + * struct get_sync_device_time - Provides method to capture device time
> + *     synchronized with raw system counter value
> + * @get_time:  Callback providing synchronized capture of device time
> + *             and system counter. Returns 0 on success, < 0 on failure
> + * @ctx:       Context provided to callback function
> + */
> +struct get_sync_device_time {
> +       int     (*get_time)(ktime_t *device,
> +                           struct raw_system_counterval *system,
> +                           void *ctx);
> +       void     *ctx;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Get cross timestamp between system clock and device clock
> + */
> +extern int get_device_system_crosststamp(struct system_device_crosststamp *ct,
> +                                        struct get_sync_device_time *dt);


I feel like this is introducing a lot of very small structures, which
to the casual reviewer aren't immediately obvious how they interlink
and are used.  It also adds to the number of types we have to keep in
our head. I dunno, maybe its just the correlated_cs is added but isn't
used in this patch, but I keep feeling like these should be more
obvious somehow.

That's terribly vague feedback, so I'm sorry.  Maybe some concrete suggestions?

* Maybe try renaming get_sync_device_time as just  crosststamp_device/struct ?

* raw_system_counterval feels like its of limited value. Maybe just
pass the clocksource and cycle value to the functions separately?




>  /*
>   * Persistent clock related interfaces
>   */
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> index d563c19..9c1ddc3 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> @@ -298,13 +298,11 @@ u32 (*arch_gettimeoffset)(void) = default_arch_gettimeoffset;
>  static inline u32 arch_gettimeoffset(void) { return 0; }
>  #endif
>
> -static inline s64 timekeeping_get_ns(struct tk_read_base *tkr)
> +static inline s64 timekeeping_delta_to_ns(struct tk_read_base *tkr,
> +                                         cycle_t delta)
>  {
> -       cycle_t delta;
>         s64 nsec;
>
> -       delta = timekeeping_get_delta(tkr);
> -
>         nsec = delta * tkr->mult + tkr->xtime_nsec;
>         nsec >>= tkr->shift;
>
> @@ -312,6 +310,24 @@ static inline s64 timekeeping_get_ns(struct tk_read_base *tkr)
>         return nsec + arch_gettimeoffset();
>  }
>
> +static inline s64 timekeeping_get_ns(struct tk_read_base *tkr)
> +{
> +       cycle_t delta;
> +
> +       delta = timekeeping_get_delta(tkr);
> +       return timekeeping_delta_to_ns(tkr, delta);
> +}
> +
> +static inline s64 timekeeping_cycles_to_ns(struct tk_read_base *tkr,
> +                                           cycle_t cycles)
> +{
> +       cycle_t delta;
> +
> +       /* calculate the delta since the last update_wall_time */
> +       delta = clocksource_delta(cycles, tkr->cycle_last, tkr->mask);
> +       return timekeeping_delta_to_ns(tkr, delta);
> +}
>

Mind splitting the above out into its own small patch?



>  /**
>   * update_fast_timekeeper - Update the fast and NMI safe monotonic timekeeper.
>   * @tkr: Timekeeping readout base from which we take the update
> @@ -885,6 +901,59 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ktime_get_raw_and_real_ts64);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_NTP_PPS */
>
>  /**
> + * get_device_system_crosststamp - Synchronously capture system/device timestamp
> + * @xtstamp:           Receives simultaneously captured system and device time
> + * @sync_devicetime:   Callback to get simultaneous device time and
> + *     system counter from the device driver
> + *
> + * Reads a timestamp from a device and correlates it to system time
> + */
> +int get_device_system_crosststamp(struct system_device_crosststamp *xtstamp,
> +                                 struct get_sync_device_time *sync_devicetime)

Another nit, but to me something like:
int get_device_system_crosststamp(struct get_sync_device_time *sync_devicetime,
                                                          struct
system_device_crosststamp *ret)

Reads better to me. ie: use this device_time -> return that crosststamp.


Otherwise this is looking pretty good.

thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ