[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <568DD0C1.1070100@stressinduktion.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 03:43:13 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: Implement fast csum_partial for x86_64
On 07.01.2016 03:36, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> <hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On 05.01.2016 19:41, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>>
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.S
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
>>> +/* Copyright 2016 Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
>>> + *
>>> + * Checksum partial calculation
>>> + *
>>> + * __wsum csum_partial(const void *buff, int len, __wsum sum)
>>> + *
>>> + * Computes the checksum of a memory block at buff, length len,
>>> + * and adds in "sum" (32-bit)
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns a 32-bit number suitable for feeding into itself
>>> + * or csum_tcpudp_magic
>>> + *
>>> + * Register usage:
>>> + * %rdi: argument 1, buff
>>> + * %rsi: argument 2, length
>>> + * %rdx: argument 3, add in value
>>
>>
>> I think you forgot to carry-add-in the %rdx register.
>>
>> The assembly code replaces do_csum but not csum_partial.
>>
> First instruction is: movl %edx, %eax /* Initialize with
> initial sum argument */
Ups, sorry. I only grepped through the source. Meanwhile my test also
uses non-zero sums and shows that it is fine.
Bye,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists