netdev - Re: question about vrf-lite

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJFZqHwpEeQce1SyqZLecehMa9hBKKc-J2r0WurAS+qRdXw_2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 7 Jan 2016 09:04:05 +0800
From:	Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@...il.com>
To:	David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: question about vrf-lite

>>
>> is it right?
>
>
> no. The above works fine for me. I literally copied and pasted all of the
> commands except the master ones which were adapted to my setup -- eth9 and
> eth11 for me instead of eth0 and eth1. tcpdump on N2, N3 show the right one
> is receiving packets based on which 'ping -I vrf<N>' is run.
>
> Do tables 5 and 6 have the right routes?


Thanks, David;

it is not VRF issue, it is my configuration issue about qemu;

I am testing VRF on qemu, and the issue/solution is same as issue
under below link

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2014-06/msg00059.html

-Roy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html