netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/5] net: vxlan: enable local checksum offload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEh+42iX4AxEektcKSSeJ+OKX5Paa+ZY5T9vXC5KYtiLvjqixg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:40:26 -0800
From:	Jesse Gross <jesse@...nel.org>
To:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc:	Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com, Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/5] net: vxlan: enable local checksum offload

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Alexander Duyck
<alexander.duyck@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com> wrote:
>> On 08/01/16 03:46, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> So I just tried testing your patches and as it turns out you are still
>>> missing some bits.  In this patch for instance the calls to
>>> udp_tunnel_xmit_skb and udp_tunnel6_xmit skb need to be updated so
>>> that you pass false for the last parameter and allow the use of your
>>> udp_set_csum modifications.
>>>
>>> - Alex
>> Are you remembering to enable outer checksums on your vxlan tunnel?  It's
>>  the vxflags & VXLAN_F_UDP_CSUM check, and to enable it you need a recent
>>  iproute2 so you can use the 'udpcsum' option when creating the vxlan device.
>
> No I hadn't done that.  I kind of assumed that the checksums were just
> being enabled by default.  That might explain the some of the issues I
> had..  ;-)
>
>> It would be nice if that could just default to enabled now that we have LCO,
>>  but I don't think we can change that now (ABIs set in stone and all that),
>>  so I think it would have to be iproute2 that turned it on by default.
>
> If anything we might want to expose the capabilities of the kernel so
> that iproute2 could make an informed decision on if it want to enable
> the outer checksum by default or not.

Keep in mind that protocols like VXLAN specify that the UDP checksum
should be set to zero. As a result, enabling the checksum is not a
purely local decision and it probably shouldn't be on by default.