[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <FC41C24E35F18A40888AACA1A36F3E418AFE3115@fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 20:51:40 +0000
From: "Nelson, Shannon" <shannon.nelson@...el.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
"Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
"Skidmore, Donald C" <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
"Williams, Mitch A" <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>
CC: "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: net-i40e: Reconsider further usage of variable "i" in
i40e_vc_get_vf_resources_msg()
> From: SF Markus Elfring [mailto:elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net]
>
> Hello,
>
> I have taken another look at the implementation of the
> function "i40e_vc_get_vf_resources_msg". I find the use of the variable
> "i"
> strange there. It seems that the value from the increment operation in
> an
> if branch is not reused so far.
>
> I would appreciate a further clarification.
> Can this variable be eventually deleted?
Thanks for pointing this out. We've got an internal patch coming that will address this.
Cheers,
sln
Powered by blists - more mailing lists