[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALx6S357fYzhCRHsPAjX+NH+5Wc1tnUuNwcZ5oy3WiAMASjOEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 09:25:13 -0800
From: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 06/10] netdev: add netdevice notifier type to
trigger a reprogramming of offloads
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
<hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> ---
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 8d8e5ca951b493..9750e46760695d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -2183,6 +2183,7 @@ struct netdev_lag_lower_state_info {
> #define NETDEV_BONDING_INFO 0x0019
> #define NETDEV_PRECHANGEUPPER 0x001A
> #define NETDEV_CHANGELOWERSTATE 0x001B
> +#define NETDEV_REFRESH_OFFLOADS 0x001C
>
Per previous discussion we don't want to generalize this current
offload interface. Can we just NETDEV_UP as the notifier?
> int register_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> int unregister_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> --
> 2.5.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists