[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160109215109.GA16810@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:51:09 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jesse@...nel.org,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/10] fm10k: add rtnl lock protection in
fm10k_io_resume
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.c
> index 4eb7a6fa6b0ddc..846d9b731c8c14 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.c
> @@ -2350,8 +2350,10 @@ static void fm10k_io_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> /* reset clock */
> fm10k_ts_reset(interface);
>
> + rtnl_lock();
> if (netif_running(netdev))
> err = fm10k_open(netdev);
> + rtnl_lock();
Hmm. Looks like copy&paste error :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists