[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160109220924.GF6877@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 23:09:24 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] net: tc35815: Fix build error due to missed
API change
> >Hi Guenter
> >
> >You fix looks right, but i'm wondering about the code which is being
> >fixed.
> >
> >How can phydev ever evaluate to true, given the break statement? Can
> >this code every detect multiple PHYs? I think not.
> >
> >Either the break needs to be removed, or we just replace the whole lot
> >with phy_find_first().
> >
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> you are right, the current code is pretty pointless.
>
> I would suggest to use phy_find_first().
Me too.
> Should I submit a separate patch, or replace my patch with v2 ?
I say a v2 which uses phy_find_first() and include in the changelog
why the current code is pointless and so the change to
phy_find_first().
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists