[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1452487360.1PLDn6dh2G@wasted.cogentembedded.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:28:14 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] sh_eth: stop reading ECMR in sh_eth_dev_init()
The code in sh_eth_dev_init() twiddling the ECMR bits always looked a bit
strange to me: if one intends to respect 'mdp->duplex', why save old value
of the ECMR.DM bit? As all the other bits are zeroed anyway, we don't really
need to read ECMR before writing to it.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: net/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c
===================================================================
--- net.orig/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c
+++ net/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c
@@ -1289,7 +1289,6 @@ static int sh_eth_dev_init(struct net_de
{
int ret = 0;
struct sh_eth_private *mdp = netdev_priv(ndev);
- u32 val;
/* Soft Reset */
ret = sh_eth_reset(ndev);
@@ -1342,10 +1341,8 @@ static int sh_eth_dev_init(struct net_de
}
/* PAUSE Prohibition */
- val = (sh_eth_read(ndev, ECMR) & ECMR_DM) |
- ECMR_ZPF | (mdp->duplex ? ECMR_DM : 0) | ECMR_TE | ECMR_RE;
-
- sh_eth_write(ndev, val, ECMR);
+ sh_eth_write(ndev, ECMR_ZPF | (mdp->duplex ? ECMR_DM : 0) |
+ ECMR_TE | ECMR_RE, ECMR);
if (mdp->cd->set_rate)
mdp->cd->set_rate(ndev);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists